<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Psychology Blog &#187; Bowlby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/tag/bowlby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog</link>
	<description>Psychology: The Online Companion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Maternal love on the brain</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/maternal-love-on-the-brain-29/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/maternal-love-on-the-brain-29/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 08:56:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cara Flanagan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowlby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fMRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social releasers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Bowlby proposed, in his theory of attachment, that humans are ‘hardwired’ to respond to social releasers from infants – they can’t help but respond to an infant’s smiles or cries of distress and this responsiveness is in our genes. New research has provided evidence of the brain circuitry involved in this response. Dr. Madoka [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><strong><a title="Mother and baby" href="http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/baby.jpg"><img class="alignleft" style="width: 212px; height: 259px; margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;" src="http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/baby.jpg" alt="Mother and baby" width="179" height="251" /></a></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0pt;"><strong>John Bowlby</strong> proposed, in his theory of attachment, that humans are ‘hardwired’ to respond to <strong>social releasers</strong> from infants – they can’t help but respond to an infant’s smiles or cries of distress and this responsiveness is in our genes. New research has provided evidence of the brain circuitry involved in this response. Dr. Madoka Noriuchi and his colleagues in Tokyo (2008, <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=pubmed&amp;uid=17686467&amp;cmd=showdetailview&amp;indexed=google" target="_blank">abstract</a>) used a brain scanning technique (fMRI) to look at how mothers’ brains respond to infants who are happy or upset/crying. Certain areas were active when the mothers observed their own infant’s smiles and cries as opposed to other infants (in particular it was areas in the cerebral cortex and limbic system). Smiling and crying are attachment behaviours – they elicit caregiving from the infant’s mother figure and ensure safety for the infant. This research shows us the neurophysiological basis for the attachment response (maternal love) and supports the view that such a response is innate &#8211; because there is a specialised area in the brain that responds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/maternal-love-on-the-brain-29/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

