<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Psychology Blog &#187; Baddeley</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/tag/baddeley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog</link>
	<description>Psychology: The Online Companion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 11:37:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Capacity of working memory</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/capacity-of-working-memory-219/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/capacity-of-working-memory-219/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cara Flanagan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Memory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology AS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Textbook updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baddeley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[central executive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[working memory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently asked by a teacher to explain an apparent contradiction in the text on working memory. On page 12 of the AS Complete Companion the text says that the central executive component of the Working Memory Model has a &#8216;very limited capacity&#8217; but later, on the same page the text says the central [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently asked by a teacher to explain an apparent contradiction in the text on working memory. On page 12 of the <em>AS Complete Companion</em> the text says that the central executive component of the Working Memory Model has a &#8216;very limited capacity&#8217; but later, on the same page the text says the central executive has &#8216;no storage capacity&#8217;. Sounds like a contradiction! But on closer inspection there isn&#8217;t a contradiction &#8211; of course the the central executive has to have some capacity to direct attention but it has no extra <span style="text-decoration: underline;">storage</span> capacity. I did double check this with Professor Alan Baddeley, who says &#8216;I assume that the executive has limited attentional capacity, but does not act as a store. Central storage in working memory is now assumed to depend on the episodic buffer&#8217;.</p>
<p>Keep your queries coming in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oxfordschoolblogs.co.uk/psychcompanion/blog/capacity-of-working-memory-219/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

